CNCNWattHubChina Energy Intelligence
ZHSign in
// NEW ENERGY

New Energy

Solar PV, wind, energy storage, hydrogen and nuclear: value-chain companies and deep-dive research.

Fossil EnergyPower & GridNew EnergyValue Chain Support
// COMPANIES

Companies in this track

Full database →
280 companies
// RESEARCH

Related research

All research →
  • Energy Storage2026-10-30

    Energy Storage Deep Dive: Price-Rise Notices Diverge from Winning Bid Prices — Cost Pass-Through, Integrator Margins and Working-Capital Risk under the Battery Consumption Tax and Narrower Export Rebates

    The energy storage value chain is in a phase of contradictory price signals: upstream cell, PCS and system makers have issued waves of price-increase notices, and the resumed battery consumption tax, narrower export VAT rebates and a lithium carbonate rebound have together raised costs, yet average winning bid prices for systems and EPC packages in public tenders have fallen over the same period. This report examines demand sources, competitive landscape, order and revenue quality, cost and cash flow pressure, and who bears the risk. Standalone storage dominates tenders and the capacity-price mechanism gives grid-side projects a revenue anchor, but EPC packages replacing equipment framework procurement mean equipment prices are constrained by owners' total budgets; the battery cluster has become the taxable node, so the tax burden passes in stages from cells and clusters to integrators; leading cell makers' shipments are surging while unit profitability falls, and integrators are financing both ends between locked-price orders, deposits and long payment terms; export business carries higher margins, alongside rising currency and market-access risk. Overall, this round of cost increases is more likely to be shared in stages between cell makers and integrators, profits are concentrating among leading companies with scale and pass-through capability, and cash flow and currency exposure are where risk mainly settles.

  • Wind2026-10-26

    Wind Power Deep Dive: Low-Price Orders Nearly Absorbed as Material Costs Rise — Turbine Margin Recovery, Shrinking Contract Liabilities and Working Capital Tie-Up

    The wind turbine OEM industry is in the recovery phase of its price cycle: broker research indicates that earlier low-price orders are nearly worked through and winning bid prices have risen from the bottom, but faster project approvals coexist with falling turbine awards, so order release is being deferred. This report examines demand sources, competitive landscape, order and revenue quality, cost and cash flow pressure, and who bears the risk. Mechanism-price auctions set a clearer ceiling on project returns, constraining developers' tolerance for equipment prices; first-half price rises in chemical feedstocks such as epoxy resin passed through blade materials to turbines and depressed some OEMs' quarterly margins; sample companies' order backlogs hit records, but rising inventory, shrinking contract liabilities and expanding borrowings point to heavier working capital tie-up; overseas orders carry higher price premiums, alongside rising delivery and currency risk. Overall, the direction of margin recovery is fairly clear, but its pace depends on whether lower costs and better collections materialise together, and profits are likely to concentrate first among leading OEMs with large-MW delivery capability and overseas certification.

  • Nuclear2026-10-23

    Nuclear Power Value Chain Special: Contracts for Difference, Long-Term Uranium Prices and Pre-Approval Tendering — Bargaining Structure and Cash-Flow Settling Points Along the Chain After Batch Approvals

    This report takes the upstream-downstream relationships of the nuclear power value chain as its subject and does not list companies. Drawing on operators' latest output and outage announcements, the State Council executive meeting's approval of a new batch of units, contracts won by Shanghai nuclear companies in pre-approval tendering, the long-term uranium prices and sales framework disclosed at CGN Mining's interim results briefing, the nuclear contract-for-difference mechanisms in Liaoning and Guangxi, and brokerage reviews of interim reports from main-equipment, forging and nuclear-grade valve makers, it traces how demand passes from approval to equipment orders, how prices are re-anchored at both the long-term uranium and nuclear tariff ends, how revenue recognition timing differs across segments, and how risk is transmitted among upstream resources, midstream manufacturing, balance-of-plant equipment, downstream operation and back-end services; cash-flow effects of acceptance timing and back-end costs remain conditional until segment data is disclosed. The report argues that approval-triggered tendering gives equipment makers order visibility far longer than their revenue-recognition rhythm; contracts for difference shift part of operators' tariff risk to commercial and industrial users; long-term agreements leave the gains from rising uranium prices with resource owners; and the cash-flow effects of acceptance timing, outages and spent-fuel disposal costs remain conditional for manufacturers and operators until segment-level data is disclosed.

  • Solar PV2026-10-23

    Solar PV Sector In-Depth: Polysilicon Price Floors, the Capacity Buy-Out Platform and Production-Cut Execution — Who Holds Upstream Pricing Power and Inventory Risk During Capacity Clearing

    This report focuses on the polysilicon segment of the solar PV manufacturing chain. Taking the price floor set by leading polysilicon producers at a closed-door meeting in Hangzhou as the lead, and combining the National Energy Administration's renewable-energy dispatch meeting on correcting mechanism tariffs, the Silicon Industry Branch's inventory and production-cut data, bid prices from central state-owned enterprises' module procurement, the institutional background of the State Administration for Market Regulation's interview at the start of the year and the capacity buy-out platform, and the Ministry of Commerce's consultation draft on PV technology export controls, it analyzes how binding the price floor, the buy-out platform and production-cut execution are while capacity clearing remains incomplete. The report argues that a gap remains between the floor and average central-SOE procurement bids, inventories continue to build, and whether the floor holds depends on production cuts and downstream demand recovery reinforcing each other; self-disciplined price support is in formal tension with antitrust remediation requirements, with compliance risk borne by polysilicon producers while price consequences are shared by downstream players and end users. The company samples cover different strategies of holding share, the granular-silicon route and cautious sales, with cash cost and cash reserves determining who can wait for clearing.

  • Hydrogen2026-10-20

    Hydrogen Industry Chain Deep Dive: Dual-Track Scoring on Vehicles and Refuelling Volume, Industrial Scenarios Brought In — Order Gaps, End-Use Hydrogen Prices and Collection Risk in the Pilot Handover Period

    The relevant authorities this week issued a notice approving several city clusters to carry out hydrogen energy comprehensive application pilots. Under the notice, transport rewards are scored on a dual track of vehicle deployment and actual refuelling volume, with vehicle points declining year by year, and the industrial sector is brought into assessment at the same time. This report traces the transmission along the upstream and downstream industry chain: back-loaded settlement of demonstration-period reward funds may affect cash recovery at fuel cell system and hydrogen storage companies, but existing disclosures do not break down the causes or shares of receivables and impairments; according to media reports, FCV production and sales fell back sharply after the demonstration closed, and the order gap may transmit to stacks, components and hydrogen refuelling stations; the new rules constrain local governments through points-based assessment, with central funds allocated to city clusters and distributed locally, and set end-use hydrogen price targets, which may shift more of the spread pressure between the production side and the consumption side onto storage-transport, refuelling operators and city clusters; electrolyser orders are concentrating among leading players but prices are under pressure, and some green ammonia/methanol projects have signed long-term agreements with shipping companies. Overall, we judge that the new pilots will not automatically improve the profitability of midstream equipment and system companies, and value and risk may concentrate more at the two ends of the chain, among those that control resources, volumes and offtake agreements.

  • Energy Storage2026-10-10

    Energy Storage Dispatch Discipline Goes Live: Spot Arbitrage, Ancillary Services and Repricing Risk Across the Value Chain

    The Xinjiang Energy Regulatory Office recently conducted collective regulatory interviews with 12 energy storage companies in its jurisdiction for failing to obey dispatch orders and charging or discharging beyond plan, bringing the conflict over the operating dispatch of storage plants to the fore. The interviewed entities covered both independent storage and storage co-located with renewables, and the core issue was "not obeying dispatch": increasing discharge power without authorisation in periods of high electricity prices or ancillary-service returns, and executing charging selectively. The event marks the storage industry's formal shift from the scale-expansion stage of "build-heavy, operate-light" to a new stage of regulated development under "strict supervision, strong operation". Taking this event as its entry point, this report dissects the structural contradiction in the revenue of independent and co-located storage, which depends heavily on spot-spread arbitrage and ancillary services and conflicts structurally with grid-security objectives; reviews the output-deviation assessment rules already implemented in Shandong, Shanxi and the five southern provinces and quantifies their impact on project revenue models; and then assesses, segment by segment along the value chain, the paths by which risk is transmitted and settles: the downstream plant-operation segment is the first to bear utilisation and revenue volatility, midstream system integrators face contractual pressure from availability and performance guarantees, the equipment segment must bear assessment losses caused by insufficient response precision, and the services segment gains an opportunity for value revaluation because it can provide accurate forecasting and rapid response. The report aims to show that, after dispatch discipline tightens, bargaining power and profit retention across the value chain will be significantly redistributed, offering industry participants a framework for risk identification and value judgment.

  • Wind2026-10-03

    Wind Power Value Chain Deep Dive: Reshaping Profits Through the Shift from the Turbine Upsizing Race to Deep Integration of Turbines and Core Components

    In 2026, China's wind power industry formally moved from scale expansion to a stage of high-quality coordinated development. The report finds that, to address the safety risks and gross-margin squeeze brought by upsizing technology's "uncharted territory", chain-leader companies led by Envision Energy and Mingyang Smart Energy are using the "in-house development and manufacture of core components" model to migrate the profit pool from single turbine assembly to upstream high-barrier segments such as blades, gearboxes and bearings. At the same time, downstream asset operators, with stable cash flows and an advantage in utilisation hours, are leading the actuarial analysis of returns under the spot electricity market. This report aims to dissect the logic of risk deposition after the failure of cost transmission and to reveal the profit-retention capability of each node of the value chain under the new trend of "wind-hydrogen-storage-intelligence" cross-sector integration.

  • Hydrogen2026-09-22

    Hydrogen Deep Dive: Green-Molecule Exports Ahead of Green Hydrogen Cost Parity, with Certification, Marine Fuel Contracts and Port Storage and Transport Determining Who Captures the Premium

    In 2026, China's green hydrogen industry recorded its first settleable overseas deliveries: Envision's Chifeng base shipped a first green ammonia cargo to LOTTE Fine Chemical of South Korea in February, SPIC's Da'an project exported 3,750 tonnes of green ammonia from Lianyungang in July, and Shanghai Electric's Taonan green methanol completed an 8,000-tonne bunkering for a CMA CGM vessel at Yangshan Port in August. This report argues that, with domestic chemical hydrogen still priced against grey hydrogen and the green attribute struggling to earn a premium, the business loop for green hydrogen is more likely to close first along the "green-molecule export + international certification + port storage and transport" chain. The demand side is not yet solid, however: the IMO Net-Zero Framework has been postponed and MEPC 84 set no timetable, South Korea's clean hydrogen power auction was cut by 83% and excludes coal-plant ammonia co-firing, and Japan's CfD overseas supply favours India. On the equipment side, electrolyser prices have fallen about 66% in three years and orders are highly concentrated, so the premium is unlikely to flow back upstream; in the medium term, profit is more likely to remain with integrated players holding certification, traceable green power and port storage and transport assets, while in the near term the negotiating surplus sits mainly with overseas buyers.

  • Nuclear2026-09-14

    Nuclear Power Deep Dive: Long Lead Times for Critical Nuclear Island Equipment, Localization Trade-Offs and a Reassessment of Supply-Chain Cash-Flow Pressures

    As China's nuclear power enters a peak period of regularized approvals and construction, critical nuclear island equipment, the highest-barrier segment of the value chain, is reaching a turning point from "technical verification" to "capacity realization". According to industry planning, China's installed nuclear capacity is expected to reach about 110 GW by 2030, an increase of more than 75% over 2025 [S1]. This report focuses on the delivery logic of long-lead nuclear island equipment, in particular nuclear pumps, nuclear-grade valves and pressure vessels. 2026 is regarded as the starting point of the component delivery peak, as domestic Generation III nuclear projects typically have a 3-4 year lag from approval to equipment delivery [S5]. At present, the gross margin of core nuclear island equipment remains at a high level above 30% [S7], but manufacturers are constrained by raw material cost volatility and lengthy quality verification cycles, and cash collection pressure is being transmitted from owners to midstream suppliers. As AI computing demand raises requirements for baseload power stability, the stable zero-carbon advantages of nuclear are driving a global nuclear recovery [S10], and the scale advantages accumulated by the domestic supply chain in the batch construction of "Hualong One" are becoming the core logic for its participation in global market competition.